{"id":3253,"date":"2026-05-26T12:13:24","date_gmt":"2026-05-26T12:13:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/?p=3253"},"modified":"2026-05-26T12:52:44","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T12:52:44","slug":"mutlak-butlanin-sinirlari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/mutlak-butlanin-sinirlari\/","title":{"rendered":"Mutlak Butlan\u0131n S\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n

Mutlak Butlan\u0131n S\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019nin (BAM) ana muhalefet partisi kurultay\u0131na y\u00f6nelik verdi\u011fi son karar, sadece siyasetin de\u011fil, hukuk d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131n da en s\u0131cak ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 haline geldi. Mahkemenin “mutlak butlan” (yani ba\u015ftan itibaren kesin ge\u00e7ersizlik) te\u015fhisi koyarak y\u00f6netimi ask\u0131ya almas\u0131, adeta bir hukuki deprem yaratt\u0131.<\/p>\n\n

Peki, televizyonlarda s\u00fcrekli d\u00f6nen bu teknik terimler asl\u0131nda ne anlama geliyor? Bu dava neden bir partinin kaderini ve T\u00fcrk hukuk sisteminin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 bu denli zorluyor? Gelin, meseleyi herkesin anlayaca\u011f\u0131 somut bir dille par\u00e7alar\u0131na ay\u0131ral\u0131m.<\/p>\n\n

Somut Bir \u00d6rnek: Mutlak Butlan Nedir, Ne Anlama Gelir?<\/h2>\n\n

Hukukta bir i\u015flemin sakat do\u011fmas\u0131 ile sonradan bozulan bir ili\u015fki olmas\u0131 tamamen farkl\u0131 \u015feylerdir. Konuyu daha iyi anlamak i\u00e7in g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayattan bir \u00f6rnek verelim:<\/p>\n\n

    \n
  • Ge\u00e7ersiz S\u00f6zle\u015fme (Nisbi Butlan \/ \u0130ptal):<\/strong> Bir arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131zdan zorla, tehditle veya yalan dolanla bir araba sat\u0131n ald\u0131n\u0131z. Arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131z kand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya tehdit edildi\u011fini anlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 an mahkemeye gidip “Beni kand\u0131rd\u0131lar, bu sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 iptal edin”<\/em> diyebilir. Ancak dava a\u00e7mazsa, o sat\u0131\u015f ge\u00e7erli kalmaya devam eder.<\/li>\n\n
  • \u00d6l\u00fc Do\u011fan S\u00f6zle\u015fme (Mutlak Butlan):<\/strong> Gidip tapu dairesinde Ankara Kalesi\u2019ni veya bir devlet hastanesini sat\u0131n almak i\u00e7in s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalad\u0131n\u0131z. Bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme, imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 saniyede \u00f6l\u00fc do\u011fmu\u015ftur<\/strong>. \u00dczerinden 50 y\u0131l ge\u00e7se de, taraflar “Biz anla\u015ft\u0131k, aram\u0131zda sorun yok”<\/em> dese de bu imza asla ge\u00e7erli olamaz. Hakim bunu g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc an, kimsenin \u015fikayet etmesini beklemeden s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi \u00e7\u00f6pe atar.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n

    \u0130\u015fte CHP kurultay\u0131 i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lan davada mahkeme, kurultaydaki oylamay\u0131 adeta “Ankara Kalesi’ni sat\u0131n almak” gibi ba\u015ftan itibaren \u00f6l\u00fc do\u011fmu\u015f bir i\u015flem olarak kabul etti.<\/p>\n\n

    CHP Davas\u0131ndaki D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm: Ger\u00e7ekten \u00d6l\u00fc Do\u011fan Bir \u0130\u015flem Var m\u0131?<\/h2>\n\n

    Davan\u0131n merkezindeki iddia \u015fu: “\u0130lk tur oylamadan sonra delegeler yan\u0131lt\u0131ld\u0131, iradeleri fesada u\u011frat\u0131ld\u0131 ve usuls\u00fczl\u00fck yap\u0131ld\u0131.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n

    Hukukun en temel ilkeleriyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm\u00fczde, bir se\u00e7menden zorla oy almak veya delegenin iradesini yan\u0131ltmak yukardaki ilk \u00f6rne\u011fimize girer. Yani ortada bir “kand\u0131rma\/irade fesad\u0131” iddias\u0131 varsa, bu durum hukuken bir hakk\u0131n iptalini<\/strong> gerektirir; i\u015flemin ba\u015ftan itibaren yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde (mutlak bat\u0131l)<\/strong> oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermez.<\/p>\n\n

    \u015eu an hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131n en \u00e7ok tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 p\u00fcr\u00fcz tam olarak buras\u0131: Ortada kamu d\u00fczenini k\u00f6kten sarsan, kanunun kesin emrini \u00e7i\u011fneyen, ba\u015ftan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 “\u00f6l\u00fc do\u011fmu\u015f” bir kurultay m\u0131 var, yoksa sadece sand\u0131k sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir itiraz m\u0131? E\u011fer mesele sadece sand\u0131k ve oylarsa, burada adli mahkemeler de\u011fil, Y\u00fcksek Se\u00e7im Kurulu (YSK) s\u00f6z sahibi olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n

    “Dava Bitmeden Koltu\u011fu Devretmek” Hukuka Uygun mu?<\/h2>\n\n

    Bu davan\u0131n okuyucuyu ve kamuoyunu en \u00e7ok \u015fa\u015f\u0131rtan k\u0131sm\u0131, mahkemenin nihai karar\u0131n\u0131 vermeden \u00f6nce uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ihtiyati tedbir<\/strong> karar\u0131 oldu.<\/p>\n\n

    Mahkeme, kurultay\u0131n iptal edilip edilmeyece\u011fine hen\u00fcz kesin olarak karar vermemi\u015fken; tedbiren mevcut y\u00f6netimin yetkilerini elinden ald\u0131 ve eski y\u00f6netimi koltu\u011fa iade etti. Bu durum hukuk tekni\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan olduk\u00e7a risklidir. Bir benzetmeyle a\u00e7\u0131klayacak edersek:<\/p>\n\n

    \n

    Bir ki\u015finin ev sahibi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir dava s\u00fcrerken, mahkemenin daha davay\u0131 bitirmeden mevcut oturan\u0131 evden tahliye edip, anahtar\u0131 eski kirac\u0131ya vermesine benzer. Dava sonunda mevcut oturan hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karsa, aradaki s\u00fcre\u00e7te ya\u015fanan kaosun ve idari bo\u015flu\u011fun telafisi imkans\u0131z hale gelecektir.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n

    Mahkeme Karar\u0131<\/h2>\n\n

    Hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131n bu karara tek bir a\u011f\u0131zdan “do\u011fru” veya “yanl\u0131\u015f” demesi biraz zorlay\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r; \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc ortada iki farkl\u0131 hukuk felsefesinin ve iki ayr\u0131 yarg\u0131 kolunun \u00e7ok ciddi bir \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 var. Ancak karar\u0131n hukuk tekni\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7ok ciddi p\u00fcr\u00fczler ve riskler bar\u0131nd\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/strong> net bir \u015fekilde s\u00f6yleyebiliriz.<\/p>\n\n

    Meseleyi tarafs\u0131z bir g\u00f6zle, hakl\u0131 ve haks\u0131z y\u00f6nleriyle masaya yat\u0131ral\u0131m:<\/p>\n\n

    Mahkemenin Hakl\u0131 G\u00f6r\u00fclebilecek Gerek\u00e7esi (\u0130ddia Kanad\u0131)<\/h2>\n\n

    E\u011fer bir genel kurulda veya kurultayda, t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn emredici h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine taban tabana z\u0131t, hileli ve organize bir irade gasp\u0131 varsa, mahkeme “Ben sadece resmi evraka bakar\u0131m, gerisine kar\u0131\u015fmam”<\/em> diyemez.<\/p>\n\n

    Kamu d\u00fczenini yak\u0131ndan ilgilendiren bir siyasi partinin organlar\u0131n\u0131n, \u015faibeli i\u015flemlerle sakatlanmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek mahkemenin g\u00f6revidir. E\u011fer iddialar do\u011fruysa ve kurultay\u0131n temelinde hukuku k\u00f6kten yok sayan bir sakatl\u0131k varsa, mahkemenin buna m\u00fcdahale etmesi teorik olarak savunulabilir.<\/p>\n\n

    Karar\u0131n Hukuken Sakat\/Zay\u0131f G\u00f6r\u00fclen Y\u00f6nleri (Savunma Kanad\u0131)<\/h2>\n\n

    \u0130\u015fin as\u0131l p\u00fcr\u00fczl\u00fc ve “Bu karar hukuk tekni\u011fine ayk\u0131r\u0131” denilen k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7 ana noktada toplan\u0131yor:<\/p>\n\n

    1. Yetki ve G\u00f6rev A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 (YSK vs. Adli Yarg\u0131)<\/h3>\n\n

    T\u00fcrkiye’de se\u00e7imlerin, sand\u0131klar\u0131n ve oylar\u0131n tek bir patronu vard\u0131r: Y\u00fcksek Se\u00e7im Kurulu (YSK)<\/strong>. Anayasa’ya g\u00f6re se\u00e7im s\u00fcre\u00e7lerindeki usuls\u00fczl\u00fck iddialar\u0131n\u0131 sadece se\u00e7im kurullar\u0131 inceleyebilir ve verdikleri kararlar kesindir. Bir asliye hukuk mahkemesinin veya istinaf dairesinin, “sand\u0131kta usuls\u00fczl\u00fck yap\u0131ld\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle se\u00e7im sonucunu ask\u0131ya almas\u0131, se\u00e7im yarg\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yetki alan\u0131na do\u011frudan bir m\u00fcdahaledir.<\/p>\n\n

    2. Tedbirin S\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n A\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131<\/h3>\n\n

    Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’na (HMK) g\u00f6re “ihtiyati tedbir”, dava bitene kadar durumu korumak i\u00e7in verilir; dava bitmi\u015f gibi sonu\u00e7 do\u011furamaz<\/strong>. Mahkeme hen\u00fcz “Kurultay iptal edilmi\u015ftir” diye kesin karar vermemi\u015fken, tedbiren mevcut y\u00f6netimi indirip eski y\u00f6netimi getirdi. Bu durum, ge\u00e7ici bir koruma de\u011fil, davan\u0131n sonunu \u015fimdiden ilan etmek demektir ki usul hukukunda buna yer yoktur.<\/p>\n\n

    3. “\u0130rade Fesad\u0131” ile “Mutlak Butlan”\u0131n Kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131<\/h3>\n\n

    Yaz\u0131m\u0131zda da belirtti\u011fimiz gibi; kand\u0131rma, yan\u0131ltma veya bask\u0131 gibi durumlar hukukta nisbi butlan (iptal edilebilirlik)<\/strong> sebebidir. Yani i\u015flem \u00f6l\u00fc do\u011fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, sadece sakatlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemenin bunu “mutlak butlan” (yani ba\u015ftan beri hi\u00e7 yokmu\u015f gibi) saymas\u0131, bor\u00e7lar hukuku ve dernekler hukuku ilkelerini olduk\u00e7a zorlayan bir yorumdur.<\/p>\n\n

    \u00d6zetle Bizim G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcz<\/h2>\n\n
    \n

    Hukuki \u00d6ng\u00f6r\u00fc:<\/strong> Mahkemenin kurultay karar\u0131na m\u00fcdahale etme niyetindeki hakl\u0131l\u0131k pay\u0131 bir kenara b\u0131rak\u0131l\u0131rsa, se\u00e7ti\u011fi usul ve verdi\u011fi ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131 hukuk tekni\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan DO\u011eRU KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ. <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n

    Dava kesinle\u015fmeden, sadece bir tedbir karar\u0131yla koskoca bir partinin y\u00f6netimini de\u011fi\u015ftirmek idari bir kaosa davetiye \u00e7\u0131karmakt\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n bu dosyay\u0131 inceledi\u011finde, \u00f6zellikle g\u00f6rev y\u00f6n\u00fcnden (YSK’n\u0131n yetkili oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle)<\/strong> veya tedbirin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebiyle<\/strong> karar\u0131 bozmas\u0131 hukuk tekni\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan en g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc ihtimaldir…<\/p>\n\n

    Av. \u00d6mer Faruk ARDI\u00c7<\/p>\n\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n\n

    Bilgi Notu ve G\u00fcncellik Verisi<\/h2>\n\n
    \n

    G\u00fcncelleme Notu:<\/strong> Bu yaz\u0131, Ankara BAM 36. Hukuk Dairesi’nin May\u0131s 2026 tarihli sansasyonel ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131 ve bu karar\u0131n Dernekler Kanunu ile Siyasi Partiler Kanunu eksenindeki yans\u0131malar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n

    Mini S\u00f6zl\u00fck (Hukuki Terimler A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131)<\/h2>\n\n

    Mutlak Butlan<\/h3>\n\n

    Bir hukuki i\u015flemin (s\u00f6zle\u015fme, karar, evlilik vb.) kanunun emredici kurallar\u0131na tamamen ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 sebebiyle do\u011fdu\u011fu andan itibaren ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131lmas\u0131, \u00f6l\u00fc do\u011fmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n

    \u0130rade Fesad\u0131<\/h3>\n\n

    Ki\u015finin korkutulma, kand\u0131r\u0131lma veya hata yoluyla normalde istemeyece\u011fi bir i\u015fleme imza atmas\u0131 durumudur.<\/p>\n\n

    \u0130htiyati Tedbir<\/h3>\n\n

    Dava s\u00fcrecinde telafisi imkans\u0131z zararlar\u0131n do\u011fmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla mahkemenin ge\u00e7ici olarak verdi\u011fi koruma karar\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n

    S\u0131k\u00e7a Sorulan Sorular (SSS)<\/h2>\n\n

    1. Mahkeme neden kurultay\u0131 do\u011frudan iptal etmedi de “tedbir” karar\u0131 verdi?<\/strong> \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc kurultay\u0131n tamamen iptal edilmesi davan\u0131n nihai sonucudur ve bu s\u00fcre\u00e7 Yarg\u0131tay a\u015famas\u0131 bitene kadar kesinle\u015fmez. Mahkeme, yarg\u0131lama sonuna kadar partinin mevcut y\u00f6netim taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6netilmesinde bir risk g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in ge\u00e7ici bir ara form\u00fcl olarak “tedbir” karar\u0131 alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n

    2. Sand\u0131ktaki usuls\u00fczl\u00fcklere YSK bakm\u0131yor mu?<\/strong> Normal \u015fartlarda se\u00e7im g\u00fcn\u00fcne, oylara ve sand\u0131klara dair her t\u00fcrl\u00fc itiraz\u0131n adresi Y\u00fcksek Se\u00e7im Kurulu\u2019dur (YSK). Ancak mahkeme, konuyu basit bir se\u00e7im usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olarak de\u011fil, dernekler hukuku kapsam\u0131nda genel kurulun k\u00f6kten sakatlanmas\u0131 (mutlak butlan) olarak g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in yetkili oldu\u011funu savunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n

    De\u011ferli meslekta\u015flar\u0131m, bu dosyada savunma veya iddia stratejisi kurarken bak\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken yer maddi hukuktan ziyade usul hukukudur. HMK m. 389’un s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 \u00e7ok nettir: \u0130htiyati tedbir, davan\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6zecek veya nihai kararla elde edilecek sonucu dava bitmeden taraflara do\u011frudan bah\u015fedecek \u015fekilde verilemez. Mevcut kararda, kurultay\u0131n butlan\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kuvvetli kanaat olu\u015ftu\u011fu belirtilerek y\u00f6netim organlar\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131, tedbir m\u00fcessesesinin “ge\u00e7ici koruma” amac\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fm\u0131\u015f, in\u015fai (yenilik do\u011furan) bir infaz sonucuna d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Mutlak Butlan\u0131n S\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131: Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019nin (BAM) ana muhalefet partisi kurultay\u0131na y\u00f6nelik verdi\u011fi son karar, sadece siyasetin de\u011fil, hukuk d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131n da en s\u0131cak ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 haline geldi. Mahkemenin “mutlak butlan” (yani ba\u015ftan itibaren kesin ge\u00e7ersizlik) te\u015fhisi koyarak y\u00f6netimi ask\u0131ya almas\u0131, adeta bir hukuki deprem yaratt\u0131. Peki, televizyonlarda s\u00fcrekli d\u00f6nen bu teknik terimler asl\u0131nda ne anlama […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[54],"class_list":["post-3253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genel","tag-mutlak-butlan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3253"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3253\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3265,"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3253\/revisions\/3265"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omerfarukardic.av.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}